Eco-efficiency analysis of products or processes
The Eco-efficiency analysis, used in this strategy, combines
environmental impact with for example toxicity and economic costs to
quantify the sustainability of products or processes from a life cycle
perspective. The result expresses the ratio of creation of economic value
to ecological impact of the products. The alternative that provides the
specific customer benefit to lowest cost and environmental burden is the
most eco-efficient. The analysis only provides comparative information and
no absolute values, since all results are normalized in order to visualize
the comparison of the products in resulting diagrams
Six different environmental impact categories are included in the
analysis;
- Raw material consumption
- Energy consumption
- Emissions to air, water and waste
- Toxicity potential
- Risk/ misuse potential
- Area use
Data acquisition and calculations are done according to ISO 140 40
standards for the categories raw material consumption, energy consumption
and emissions. For the other categories, other ways to compile and assess
data has been developed.
The procedure
Below is a schematic model of the method.

Figure 1 Schematic model of Eco-efficiency analysis (From BASF)
The first step in the analysis is to define the customer benefit, which
leads to a definition of functional unit. Alternative technologies are
also defined during this process. As many competing products or processes
as possible should be included. The ecological analysis starts out as a
Life Cycle Inventory, done according to ISO 14040-14043. For each
alternative, all input during the life cycle, such as raw materials and
energy, and all output during the life cycle, such as emissions to air,
water and wastes, is compiled and calculated.
The toxicity potential and risk potential are also assessed in this
step. The toxicity potential is based on European risk phrases. When no
classification with European Risk phrases for a substance is available,
toxicologists carries out an assessment. For the analysis of risk
potential possible hazards for all alternatives is defined and the
likelihood and impact of each hazard is assessed.
Life Cycle Inventory
The Eco-efficiency analysis includes a Life Cycle Inventory, LCI. The LCI
is the first step in a Life Cycle Assessment, LCA, which is a common used
tool to assess the potential environmental impacts of product systems or
services. In an LCI all stages in the life cycle - from extraction of
resources, through the production and use of the product to reuse,
recycling or final disposal is included.
The data collection forms must be properly designed for optimal
collection. Subsequently data are validated and related to the functional
unit in order to allow the aggregation of results. A very sensitive step
in this calculation process is the allocation of flows e.g. releases to
air, water and land. Most of the existing technical systems yield more
than one product. Therefore, materials and energy flows regarding the
process as a whole, as well as environmental releases must often be
allocated to the different products.
Weighting
The environmental impact categories are combined via a weighting scheme to
form a total value for environmental impact. This weighting scheme is made
up of relevance factors and societal factors (see Figure 2). The weighted
result is used to compare different alternatives.

Figure 2 Composition of the total weighting factors
First of all, the relevance and society factors need to be determined.
The societal factors are based on public views and opinion polls on how
important it is to avoid certain impact categories and they are adjusted
to the geographical region, where the study is performed.
The relevance factors answers the question; how much does the product
or process contribute to the total environmental impact in the
geographical area? The relevance factor, also called scientific weighting
factor, indicate how important the individual environmental impact
categories of the product are to the total environmental impact in the
reference area.
Costs
In the cost analysis, the costs for the end customer are summarized. That
means for example sales price, costs related to utilization of the product
and costs related to end of life treatment. The sales price normally
reflects production price. For durable goods the cash value method is
used. In addition, costs for the individual life cycle segments for all
alternatives can be compiled, to form the basis for the analysis.
Presentation of results
The result of the analysis is presented in an eco-efficiency diagram that
illustrates the normalized relationship between the different products.
Cost and environmental impact form the two axis of the eco-efficiency
diagram. The scale is inverted so products with lowest price and lowest
environmental impact are found in the upper right corner.

Figure 3 The Eco-efficiency diagram shows the result of the
eco-efficiency study
The greater the distance of the points from the diagonal towards
top-right is, the higher the eco-efficiency of the alternatives. The
diagram is easy to understand for people not involved in the study since
the results in all categories have been normalized, weighted together and
plotted as one point for each alternative in the diagram.
Results from the analysis of the Environmental impact are combined in
an Ecological Fingerprint. Each environmental impact category is
normalized, which means that the worst case in each category is assigned
the value one and the others receive a value in relation to one. Example;
if Product A has 50 kg emissions and product B has 40 kg emissions,
Product A assigned 1 and Product is assigned 0,8. Each product is
illustrated in the fingerprint with a line. Lines further to the central
of the fingerprint have lower environmental load.

Figure 4 The Ecological fingerprint shows the result of the
environmental impact
Experiences

|