How to perform application
specific Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA)
A general finding from
many risk assessment studies is that chronic eco-toxicity data are often
lacking. The assessment factors (safety factors applied in order not to
underestimate the risk) for the Predicted No-Effect Concentration (PNEC) are
therefore high. Essential physico-chemical properties, such as figures for
biodegradation or the octanol-water partition coefficient (Kow)
are also often lacking and this results in difficulties in modeling the environmental
distribution of the chemical. The QSAR (Quantifiable Structure Activity
Relationship) models for calculating the Kow are not reliable for
surface active chemicals, which makes it even harder to model these kind of
chemicals.
In the kind of
initial risk assessment that is described here many assumptions, hypothesis
and worst case scenarios are discussed and analyzed. This is OK in an initial
assessment, but it may be hard to know whether the assumptions or choices would be accepted in a review
of a full risk assessment. In the European
chemical Substances Information System (ESIS) many chemical risk assessments
can be downloaded and answers of how to approach the chemical modeling may be found in these.
To learn about
modeling the distribution of chemicals in the environment it may be educational not
to use a software tool, but to
calculate it "by hand", using the
Technical
Guidance Document (TGD) as guidance.
EUSES (European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances) is a useful tool, but in
order to know what happens "behind the interface" the equations and default
figures have to be known.
Business value
Performing environmental risk assessments within a company is most often a
requirement from authorities for registering a chemical product for a specific
use or in order to get a production permit for a specific site.
Knowing whether the product may cause detrimental effects in the
environment, in the short as well as the long term, helps in avoiding unwanted surprises
later on. ERA is one tool that can help in determining this, because
possible risks are clearly presented for all of the life cycle steps, from
the production to the end use and the waste handling. ERA studies can
also assist in deciding if toxicity tests and/or exposure
measurements are useful or necessary to perform, which makes it easier to
plan the needed resources.
A risk assessment will probably be required in the safety report
of the new chemicals
policy, REACH, and ERA will thereby be an important tool in the future
registration and authorization process of chemicals.
Having the competence
within the company for making these environmental risk assessments reduces the
costs for external consultants and makes it easier to discuss arising
environmental issues with the authorities. Using the strategy early in the
product development process may also be beneficial in that possible
environmental effects from using the product can be foreseen and risk management
measures implemented earlier.
|